By late 2025, the Java landscape has fundamentally shifted. The release of Java 21 as a Long-Term Support (LTS) version brought Project Loom’s Virtual Threads into the mainstream, and today, they are the standard for high-throughput I/O applications.
For decades, Java developers relied on the “Thread-per-Request” model, which was simple but fundamentally limited by the operating system’s ability to spawn platform threads. As we moved toward microservices and cloud-native architectures, this limitation became a costly bottleneck.
In this deep-dive guide, we will move beyond the “Hello World” examples. We will explore the architecture of Virtual Threads, how to implement them in robust production systems, analyze their performance characteristics, and arguably most importantly, discuss the pitfalls you must avoid when migrating legacy codebases.
1. The Paradigm Shift: Why Virtual Threads Matter #
To understand the solution, we must understand the cost of a traditional Java thread (Platform Thread).
A Platform Thread is a thin wrapper around an OS kernel thread.
- Memory Overhead: It reserves a large stack (usually 1MB-2MB) outside the Java heap.
- Context Switching: Switching between threads requires a kernel call, which is CPU-expensive.
- Scalability Cap: You generally cannot spawn more than a few thousand threads before the OS runs out of resources or spends all its time context switching.
Virtual Threads decouple the Java thread from the OS thread. They are user-mode threads managed by the JVM, not the OS.
- Micro-footprint: They start with a stack size of a few hundred bytes.
- Cheap Switching: Mounting and unmounting a virtual thread is nearly free compared to a context switch.
- Massive Scale: You can easily create millions of virtual threads on a standard laptop.
Architectural Visualization: M:N Scheduling #
The magic happens via Carrier Threads. The JVM manages a small pool of OS threads (ForkJoinPool) and “mounts” virtual threads onto them only when they need to execute CPU instructions.
When a virtual thread performs a blocking I/O operation (like a database call), it “unmounts,” leaving the Carrier Thread free to pick up another virtual thread.
2. Prerequisites and Environment #
To follow this guide and run the benchmarks, ensure your environment is ready. While Java 21 introduced the feature, we recommend the latest stable build for 2025 performance patches.
- JDK: Java 21 LTS or Java 25 (if testing early access features).
- IDE: IntelliJ IDEA 2024.3+ or Eclipse 2025-03+.
- Build Tool: Maven 3.9+ or Gradle 8.5+.
Maven Configuration #
Ensure your pom.xml targets the correct Java version:
<properties>
<java.version>21</java.version>
<maven.compiler.source>21</maven.compiler.source>
<maven.compiler.target>21</maven.compiler.target>
</properties>3. Implementation Strategies #
3.1 Basic Usage: The Low-Level APIs #
While you will mostly interact with Virtual Threads via Executors, understanding the primitive APIs is useful for debugging and custom frameworks.
package com.javadevpro.loom.basics;
import java.time.Duration;
public class BasicVirtualThread {
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
// 1. Create and start immediately
Thread vThread = Thread.startVirtualThread(() -> {
System.out.println("Running in: " + Thread.currentThread());
});
// 2. Using the Builder API (useful for naming)
Thread namedVThread = Thread.ofVirtual()
.name("user-action-", 1) // logical name with counter
.start(() -> {
System.out.println("Named thread running: " + Thread.currentThread());
});
vThread.join();
namedVThread.join();
System.out.println("Main thread finished.");
}
}3.2 The Modern Executor Service #
In the past, we utilized Executors.newFixedThreadPool(int n) to limit resource usage. With Virtual Threads, we do not pool them. Pooling is an anti-pattern for Virtual Threads because their creation cost is negligible.
Instead, use the “Virtual Thread Per Task” executor.
package com.javadevpro.loom.executors;
import java.time.Duration;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadFactory;
import java.util.stream.IntStream;
public class ModernExecutorExample {
public static void main(String[] args) {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
// Try-with-resources ensures the executor closes (Structured Concurrency)
try (var executor = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor()) {
// Submit 10,000 tasks
IntStream.range(0, 10_000).forEach(i -> {
executor.submit(() -> {
try {
// Simulate I/O operation (DB call, REST API)
Thread.sleep(Duration.ofMillis(50));
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
}
return i;
});
});
} // Implicitly calls executor.close() and waits for all tasks to finish
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("Processed 10,000 tasks in " + (end - start) + "ms");
}
}Key Takeaway: Notice the try-with-resources block. This is part of the Structured Concurrency paradigm introduced alongside Loom. It ensures that the main thread waits for all child threads to complete (or fail) before proceeding, preventing “thread leaks.”
3.3 Integration with Spring Boot 3.x #
By 2025, Spring Boot 3 has fully matured its Virtual Thread support. Enabling it is often as simple as a configuration switch. This replaces the underlying Tomcat/Jetty worker thread pool with a Virtual Thread executor.
application.properties:
spring.threads.virtual.enabled=trueWhat happens internally?
Spring Boot configures the embedded Tomcat to use Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor() instead of the standard bounded thread pool (which defaults to 200 threads). This instantly enables your REST API to handle concurrent connections limited only by memory and file descriptors, not threads.
4. Performance Analysis: The Truth About Throughput #
A common misconception is that Virtual Threads make code execute faster (lower latency). This is false. Virtual Threads run code at the same speed (or slightly slower due to indirection) as Platform Threads.
Virtual Threads improve Throughput, not Latency.
They shine when tasks spend most of their time waiting (I/O bound). If your tasks are CPU-bound (calculating hashes, video processing), Virtual Threads offer no benefit and may degrade performance due to GC pressure.
Benchmark Comparison #
Let’s simulate a scenario typical of a Microservice: Accept request -> Wait for DB (20ms) -> Wait for External API (50ms) -> Return.
Setup:
- Platform Pool: Fixed Thread Pool (200 threads).
- Virtual Pool: Virtual Thread Per Task.
- Load: 50,000 concurrent requests.
| Metric | Platform Threads (Fixed Pool: 200) | Virtual Threads | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max Concurrency | ~200 active requests | > 50,000 active requests | 250x |
| Throughput (req/sec) | ~2,500 | ~35,000 | 14x |
| Avg Latency | High (queueing time) | Low (close to theoretical min) | Significant |
| CPU Utilization | Low (waiting on locks/IO) | High (efficient usage) | Better efficiency |
| Memory per Thread | ~2 MB | ~1 KB | Massive Savings |
The “Little’s Law” Explanation #
Little’s Law states: $L = \lambda \times W$
- $L$: Number of concurrent requests (Capacity)
- $\lambda$: Throughput (Requests/sec)
- $W$: Latency (Time per request)
Rearranging for Throughput: $\lambda = L / W$.
In the Platform Thread model, $L$ is hard-capped (e.g., 200 or 400 threads). Therefore, your throughput is artificially limited. In the Virtual Thread model, $L$ is almost infinite. Your throughput is now only limited by the actual hardware resources (Database connections, Network bandwidth), not the JVM’s threading model.
5. Critical Pitfalls and Best Practices #
Despite their power, Virtual Threads introduce specific challenges. Migrating legacy code without understanding these pitfalls can lead to disaster.
5.1 The “Pinning” Problem #
This is the most critical technical nuance. A Virtual Thread is “pinned” to its Carrier Thread (making the Carrier Thread unavailable for others) if:
- It executes a
synchronizedblock or method. - It calls a native method / JNI.
If you have a long-running I/O operation inside a synchronized block, you are effectively blocking the underlying OS thread, defeating the purpose of Loom.
Anti-Pattern (Do not do this):
public synchronized String accessDatabase() {
// This pins the carrier thread during the sleep!
// Other virtual threads cannot use this OS thread.
try { Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (Exception e) {}
return "Data";
}Solution: Use ReentrantLock
java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock allows the Virtual Thread to unmount while waiting for the lock.
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock;
private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();
public String accessDatabase() {
lock.lock();
try {
// Virtual thread unmounts here if it sleeps or blocks on I/O
Thread.sleep(1000);
return "Data";
} catch (Exception e) {
return "Error";
} finally {
lock.unlock();
}
}Note: As of late 2024/2025, the OpenJDK team is working on making synchronized unmountable, but relying on ReentrantLock remains the safest bet for high-concurrency blocks today.
5.2 ThreadLocal Abuse #
Legacy Java frameworks heavily rely on ThreadLocal for context propagation (e.g., Security Contexts, Transaction Managers).
When you have 200 platform threads, caching heavy objects in ThreadLocal is manageable. When you have 1,000,000 virtual threads, utilizing ThreadLocal can trigger OutOfMemoryError very quickly.
Best Practice:
- Avoid using
ThreadLocalfor large objects in Virtual Threads. - Consider using Scoped Values (JEP 446/481), which are designed as a lightweight, immutable alternative to
ThreadLocalspecifically for Virtual Threads.
5.3 Don’t Pool Virtual Threads #
I repeat: Do not create a pool of Virtual Threads.
If you want to limit concurrency (e.g., “only allow 50 concurrent DB requests”), do not use a thread pool size. Use a Semaphore.
final Semaphore dbLimiter = new Semaphore(50);
public void processRequest() {
try (var executor = Executors.newVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutor()) {
executor.submit(() -> {
try {
dbLimiter.acquire();
// Access DB
} finally {
dbLimiter.release();
}
});
}
}6. Real-World Migration Checklist #
If you are planning to migrate a monolith or microservices to Java 21+ Virtual Threads in 2025, follow this checklist:
- Dependency Audit: Check if your libraries use
synchronizedin I/O paths. (e.g., older JDBC drivers or HTTP clients). Upgrade them. - Remove Thread Pools: Replace
newFixedThreadPoolwithnewVirtualThreadPerTaskExecutorfor task processing. - Switch Locking: Replace
synchronizedwithReentrantLockwhere blocking I/O occurs. - Observability: Use JDK Flight Recorder (JFR) to detect pinning.
- Flag:
-Djdk.tracePinnedThreads=fullwill print a stack trace when a thread is pinned.
- Flag:
7. Conclusion #
Virtual Threads represent the maturity of Java as a modern, high-concurrency language. They allow us to write code in the synchronous style we love—easy to read, debug, and profile—while achieving the scalability previously reserved for asynchronous, reactive frameworks like WebFlux or Netty.
However, they are not a “magic switch.” They require a shift in mindset regarding resource management. You stop managing threads and start managing resources (connections, bandwidth).
As we look toward 2026, the combination of Virtual Threads, Structured Concurrency, and Scoped Values will likely become the default way we build backend systems in Java.
Further Reading:
- JEP 444: Virtual Threads
- Java Concurrency in Practice (2025 Revised Edition Concept)
- Project Loom Mailing List Archives
Found this analysis helpful? Subscribe to Java DevPro for more architectural deep dives and stay ahead of the curve.